About
Randy Krum
President of InfoNewt.
Data Visualization and Infographic Design

Infographic Design

Infographics Design | Presentations
Consulting | Data Visualizations

DFW DataViz Meetup

Join the DFW Data Visualization and Infographics Meetup Group if you're in the Dallas/Fort Worth area!

Search the Cool Infographics site

Custom Search

Subscriptions:

 

Feedburner

The Cool Infographics® Gallery:

How to add the
Cool Infographics button to your:

Cool Infographics iOS icon

- iPhone
- iPad
- iPod Touch

 

Read on Flipboard for iPad and iPhone

Featured in the Tech & Science category

Flipboard icon

Twitter Feed
From the Bookstore

Caffeine Poster

The Caffeine Poster infographic

« The Awesome Tower of Beer! | Main | The Lifespan of Storage Media »
Wednesday
Aug152012

Which Countries were Successful at the Olympics?

Which Countries were Successful at the Olympics? infographic

A personal infographic design project by Paulo Estriga, Which Countries were really the Most Successful in London 2012? compares the Top 10 medal winning countries with a normalized set of data showing the number of medals per one million people in the population of each country.

The official standings are reached by counting the number of gold medals obtained by each country, using silver and gold [bronze? - Randy] medals to break ties.  By this method, the USA was the most successful country, followed by China in second and Great Britain in third.

However, most of these countries have many millions of people to pick from, which naturally generates a large number of quality athletes making it to the Olympics.  What happens when we take population numbers into account?  Which are really the most successful countries in getting the most gold medals out of the fewest people?

This design is clear, easy-to-read, and does a great job of showing how normalizing the data with population gives you a very different result.  He clearly cited his sources, included a copyright statement and the URL to his site.  I would have preferred the URL to be directly to the infographic.

Paulo’s structure of the overall infographic is a great example of the 3-part story format!  The introduction visualizes the traditional way of measuring countries based on their gold medal counts, by showing medal icons.  The Main Event is the visualization of the new, normalized for population chart that shows something new and unexpected to the reader.  Finally, a conclusion wraps up the design describing where the traditional Top 10 countries fall in the new ranking.

Outstanding job Paulo!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (2)

Hi Randy,

This is an awesome infographic looking at medal counts and population - definitely a nice job Paulo! It caught my attention because of another infographic that Misfit Wearables (disclosure: I work with them) just posted looking at other factors like obesity, military spending etc and how they relate to Olympic medal count - I invite you to check it out! http://bit.ly/RzJZzu

We make a bunch of different kinds of infographics regularly, so please let me know how we can work together to share cool infographics.

Best,

Hadi
August 21, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterHadi
Great infographic. It shows that pure medal count severely favors countries with large populations. However, the way you calculated it is simply the opposite of this. Countries with tiny populations that get 1 medal are highly favored (half of the top ten are like this: Grenada, Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Slovenia and Latvia). For China to get in your top 10 list they would have to win 640 out of 302 golds (pretty silly).
August 29, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterm P
Editor Permission Required
While we are migrating to a new site design, you must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.